NEW PODCAST! 100th Episode Celebration!! | First-Look Review of the FUJIFILM GFX ETERNA 55 →🎙️ WATCH/LISTEN Now
100th Episode! 🎉 | GFX ETERNA 55 First-Look Review🎙️ NEW PODCAST: Watch/Listen Now
Education for Filmmakers
Language
The CineD Channels
Info
New to CineD?
You are logged in as
We will send you notifications in your browser, every time a new article is published in this category.
You can change which notifications you are subscribed to in your notification settings.
Camera height is one of the simplest filmmaking tools, and yet it’s also one of the most powerful. It’s subtle, it doesn’t require complicated gear, and it impacts the viewers subconsciously. Lift the camera up a bit, and the character in frame suddenly looks smaller, more fragile, powerless, or under judgment. Drop the camera down, and they grow, become confident, dangerous, or even mythic. Let’s examine how filmmakers use high and low-angle shots, and what this seemingly simple technique can reveal.
Yes, this topic belongs to basic film theory. However, sometimes it’s exciting to revisit the simplest tools and refresh your knowledge of how to use them to enhance your storytelling. Camera height is not only about directing the audience’s gaze – it’s mainly about introducing a subjective perspective. And that’s one of the main ideas we’ll discuss below.
What’s the most common angle you see in the films, if you were to make a statistical analysis? This would be an eye-level shot, set at the most “normal,” neutral, and steady camera height. The one that we hardly notice. The name speaks for itself, but let’s check the definition anyway. Here’s one from our MZed course “Fundamentals of Directing:”
In the course, the filmmaker and educator Kyle Wilamowski offers us an example shot from “True Grit” by the Coen brothers. He emphasizes that by staying at the characters’ eye level, we experience the world as they do. Nothing can distract us from it.
Here’s another instance that allows the audience to meet the characters face-to-face. A compilation of scenes from Céline Sciamma’s “Portrait of a Lady on Fire.”
The film generally keeps the camera close to the women’s faces and at eye level during their meetings. What effect does it have on the audience? First, you become a neutral observer who can decide for yourself how you feel about the characters without being pushed in one direction. Secondly, the shot choice says something like: We’re not above or below them; we are with them in these intimate, honest moments, invited to watch their glances and small gestures. And last, but not least, to me, it communicates the equality between the characters and their quiet, hidden passion. So, it’s a perfect choice for this story, not only because it’s neutral, but also because it’s so calm and genuine.
Yet, if we were to put the camera even slightly above the eye line, the feeling of a neutral observer would go away in an instant. This type of shot is called a high-angle shot, in which the camera looks down upon the subject or object. Think about it: looking down on someone. The phrase alone already implies a kind of superiority for the viewer. No wonder it can make the character we’re looking at feel weak and powerless.
Connecting the power to the height of perspective can even become a metaphor, going through the whole movie and making an obvious point. For instance, Bong Joon Ho’s “Parasite” uses vertical space and high angles to map class: The rich live above, the poor below (and the poorest – underground). When the camera looks down on a character in the lower-working-class house, it emphasizes their distance from power. In this case, we are certainly not neutral observers anymore.
However, the high-angle shot is not only about diminishing a character. On the contrary, it can create a completely opposite effect.
Imagine we place the camera even higher above the character and create a frame like this:
Does it feel as if the character is powerless or weak? No, even if you just look at the still above without having watched the film, I doubt you would answer otherwise. And when it is placed at the end of a very intense escape scene, the effect only increases:
As Kyle Wilamowski points out, the character has just escaped from prison, and although we’re looking directly down upon him, it feels like an empowering moment of freedom. He’s reaching his hands toward the sky, and amid the storm and lightning, the camera implies that we, the viewers, take the perspective of some higher force, which can also be a subjective effect created by such a framing.
This type of shot is rather an extreme example of a high-angle, more commonly known as a bird’s-eye view, or a top shot. If you’re interested in what else it can do, head over here to read our article on the topic.
Now, a low-angle shot is the opposite of a high-angle shot. Dropping the camera down and looking up at someone or something makes them bigger-than-life. First of all, that can surely change how we feel about characters, making them appear confident, powerful, in control, or even heroic. (That’s why we often meet this type of angle in superhero movies.)
At the same time, this perspective makes us, the viewers, feel small in relation to the character, so filmmakers may use low-angle shots to intimidate us. Especially when they combine it with a POV framing (point-of-view). Take the last scene and the last shot of Tarantino’s “Inglourious Basterds” as an example. (Trigger warning: this is a cruel scene and contains a graphic depiction of violence.)
Nerve-wracking, isn’t it? The same visual storytelling tool is used in the scene where we see E.T.’s antagonists arrive. The low-angle combined with POV makes the trucks appear like huge growling monsters (starting from 02:54):
Of course, we don’t know much about this creature at this point in the film. Yet the choice of low angle contributes to our sense of E.T.’s vulnerability. Thanks to these shots, it’s easier to feel sympathy for the alien and fear the huge, menacing trucks with humans. So, the visual decisions unconsciously shape our perspective, subtly guiding us where the story needs to go.
Another interesting example of a low-angle shot is the curse monologue scene from “The Lighthouse” (from 01:40):
This film, in general, uses very distinct camera language (for example, we wrote about its unusual aspect ratio here). That’s why every shot and choice feels intentional, and different from how they would “normally” work. In the scene we just watched, Willem Dafoe’s character is not only a menacing old guy but also confined within a looming, tight frame. The low angle somehow adds a ritualistic and almost mythic vibe to his monologue, doesn’t it? It’s not a point of view, but you suddenly cannot take your eyes off him. He isn’t a hero here, nor is he a menace. Yet he does seem possessed by some otherworldly force. Pick another angle, and he’ll transform into a simple, crazy drunk.
Of course, we’re not tied to a single choice and can combine high- and low-angle shots within one scene. Most frequently, this is used to imply a power play between characters. One of my favorite examples is the scene between professors Umbridge and McGonagall in “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix:”
The transformation of who holds the power in the scene is so brilliantly executed. Completely obvious and in our face, yet nevertheless visually impactful.
Another example is from Sam Mendes’s masterpiece “American Beauty.” However, here, filmmakers play with our expectations rather than using high and low angles in a traditional way.
Kevin Spacey’s character is framed in a low angle during the scene where he quits because nobody expects this loser to be capable of anything in his life. Yet it’s exactly here that he suddenly wields power, blackmailing his boss. And it creates an interesting dissonance in how we feel towards the character, which accompanies us throughout the entire film.
So, low angle, high angle, or eye-line? It depends on what story you want to tell, the perspective you want to communicate, and the feeling you want to evoke in viewers. The camera height is cheap and fast to change on set, but it carries weight. Thus, before you choose, it’s best to ask yourself: what effect do I want to create? And then choose the angle accordingly.
When do you decide to go for high and low angles in your projects? Do you have film examples that achieve a completely different impact by using camera height as a tool? Please, share them with us in the comments below!
Feature image source: film stills from “The Lighthouse” by Robert Eggers, 2019; “Inglorious Basterds” by Quentin Tarantino, 2009; and “Parasite” by Boon Joon Ho, 2019.
Full disclosure: MZed is owned by CineD
Additional source: “Cinematic Storytelling” by Jennifer Van Sijll, 2005.
Δ
Stay current with regular CineD updates about news, reviews, how-to’s and more.
You can unsubscribe at any time via an unsubscribe link included in every newsletter. For further details, see our Privacy Policy
Want regular CineD updates about news, reviews, how-to’s and more?Sign up to our newsletter and we will give you just that.
You can unsubscribe at any time via an unsubscribe link included in every newsletter. The data provided and the newsletter opening statistics will be stored on a personal data basis until you unsubscribe. For further details, see our Privacy Policy
Mascha Deikova is a freelance director and writer based in Salzburg, Austria. She creates concepts for and works on commercials, music videos, corporate films, and documentaries. Mascha’s huge passion lies in exploring all the varieties of cinematic and narrative techniques to tell her stories.