Trump Proposes 100% Tariff on Films Produced Outside the U.S., Industry Wonders What That Actually Means

Industry News

by Nino LeitnerMay 5^th, 2025

In a move that sent shockwaves through the film industry over the weekend, U.S. President Donald Trump announced plans to pursue a 100% tariff on all movies produced outside the United States. Declaring foreign production a “national security threat,” Trump claimed that other countries are luring American filmmakers abroad with aggressive tax incentives, thus undermining domestic production and American jobs. What do the “Trump movie tariffs” actually mean? We try to break it down.

Trump made the announcement via a post, stating: “Hollywood, and many other areas within the U.S.A., are being devastated. This is a concerted effort by other nations and, therefore, a National Security threat… WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!”. He has reportedly instructed the U.S. Trade Representative and Department of Commerce to begin implementing the measure.

Industry impact and legal uncertainty about Trump movie tariffs

The immediate reaction from the industry to the Trump movie tariffs suggestion has been one of confusion. The Motion Picture Association declined to comment, and insiders say studios and streamers are scrambling to understand the legal basis and potential scope of the proposed tariffs.

California Governor Gavin Newsom swiftly responded, calling the announcement “another baseless and legally impossible stunt.” Newsom argued that Trump lacks the authority to unilaterally impose such tariffs and described the plan as “economic malpractice” that could further destabilize a struggling entertainment economy.

Adding to the ambiguity is the lack of clarity about what constitutes a “foreign-produced” film. Would a movie partially shot abroad but edited in Los Angeles be taxed? Would independent international cinema or streaming-only releases be caught in the crossfire? These questions remain unanswered.

Context: economic realities behind “runaway production”

The policy seems designed to address concerns around “runaway production,” where American film and television productions choose to shoot abroad to capitalize on lower labor costs and government incentives. Countries like the UK, Canada, Australia, and Hungary have become popular destinations for this reason. In California alone, approximately 18,000 full-time industry jobs have been lost in the past three years, according to IATSE.

Still, the U.S. film trade balance remains positive globally, as noted in the Motion Picture Association’s 2023 report. And while foreign shoots are often cost-driven, they don’t necessarily result in a loss of overall economic value for the U.S. industry.

Jon Voight’s role in the Trump movie tariffs and the political optics

Trump’s comments appear to be tied to a broader initiative led in part by actor Jon Voight, one of several “special ambassadors” appointed earlier this year to help “bring Hollywood back.” According to Deadline, Voight has been meeting with unions such as the DGA, IATSE, and Teamsters in an effort to develop a “plan to save Hollywood”. However, the specifics of that plan remain vague, and many major unions, including the WGA and SAG-AFTRA, have yet to formally engage.

What comes next?

At the time of writing, no executive order or legislative action has been taken to enforce the proposed tariff. The administration’s path forward remains uncertain, and legal analysts suggest any such tariff would face substantial judicial and congressional hurdles.

For filmmakers, the announcement adds a new layer of uncertainty at a time when the industry is already navigating rising costs, shifting streaming economics, and a post-strike recovery. Whether this is a symbolic gesture or the beginning of a real policy push remains to be seen.

What’s your take on this? Do you think this will in any way help the a reeling industry in the U.S.? Let us know in the comments below.