Advertisement

DSLR RIG REVIEW

January 23rd, 2010 Jump to Comment Section 192

img_5049

Cinevate:

I think it is OK to say, that we are back with our problem child of the first part of the review. The Cinevate gear has proven to be of rather low quality, very difficult and time consuming to setup. These attributes also apply to the handheld part of the rig. Unfortunately, we set up the base plate improperly. The articulations could have been set in a z-shaped manner. Below is a photograph showing the correct setup, this will also allow for use of a loupe like a Zacuto Z-Finder (we talked about the problem of using the Z-Finder on this base plate in the first part of the review) or LCDVF.

img_5244

The base plate is more stable like that, but still not stable enough for our tastes. If we had setup the base plate correctly, we could have used the matte box with our long still photo lens.

img_5029 img_0304

Talking about stability we found it hard or impossible to keep everything on this rig stable.

None of the basic screws on this rig lock or open entirely, so it gave us a hard time to adjust and use.

img_5046

When testing the sideways balance, at one point the screws on the handles weren’t strong enough and the rig dropped sideways, even without the additional 1.8kg. weight of a matte box or follow focus.

img_5047 img_5048 img_5035

x

<< Chrosziel Handheld Verdict

x

x

Index

x

x

Cinevate Handheld 2/3 >>

x

192 Comments

Subscribe
Notify of

Filter:
all
Sort by:
latest
Filter:
all
Sort by:
latest

Take part in the CineD community experience